Vote to kick, no power to one person, server admin

[Timberwo1f]

I just think about how votekick should works. it isn't good, but I just want to suggest it

How votekick should works:
1. Votekick will be triggered by one of these condition.
1.1 Admins.
1.2 33% of players in that server (it must reach 33% within 3 minutes from the first votekick).
1.3 Devs or mods.
2. When votekick is triggered, everyone but who got votekick will have 30 seconds to vote.
3. If 67% of playes vote for yes, he will be kicked and ban for 5 or 10 minutes for that server.
4. If all of players for yes, he will be kicked and ban for a hour for that server.
6. If percentage of players who vote for yes is lower than 67%. Votekick is fail and player(s) who triggered vote kick can't trigger votekick again for 5 or 10 minutes. Also, if player(s) who triggered votekick and it is fail for 3 times, that player(s) will have no right to trigger it for a hour.

How to trigger votekick:
Player can bring scoreboard and right-click at name and trigger votekick.

If you want to and any idea or remove something to improve it, just quote it and edit it. I don't mind.

[AJoao611]

/sign, FINALLY no more NOOB admins kicking the guys on their team to clan stack... (aka Click E-Sports clan) damn, I hate those noobs, also the ones that kick for killing them and for tea-bagging the USAS/MP5 noob admins (again, aka 1 guy and another troll noob kid of Click E-Sports clan and SM clan), and the ones that don't want ppl to speak "foreign" languages...

[Faron666]

i'm not agree with this topic

i'm admin and i see lot of guys who rage and wants to kick a good player ...

i see today a guy who insult me because i do 2 headshot (my score final with my recon 9/11...) and so if this topic give to player the right to kick an admin who pay the server... no comment ...

[axe999]

great idea but they can just rejoin so if they get kick from the sever engough times just ban them for 30 mins

[AMMO]

*/anti sign, the amount of people who would vote kick helicopter pilots would be sticking

[fr4ser]

I do not think EAsy will ever enable vote kick on official servers.

If you want votekick then play on servers that have it activated.

Rent your own server, dont give yourself admin, enable votekick, rage as you get voted out of it for killing people

[BabeTheBlueOx]

People would "vote kick" people that are better than them

[havy0]

Amen to that /sign even kick the teamkillers and rammers when admin and mods r not around or just want to be jerks. vote kick 3 needed

[TacticalS]

One of the most used reasons i have to kick someone is votekickabuse.

Still it`s a good system but is got it`s cons as well.

[i6n0r4n7eK]

I'm in. With this we will able to kick people who ignore the server rules with out a mod/admin.
/sign

[GertsBush]

(26-07-2011 05:01 AM)Vedram napisał(a):  This would be really good against hackers. Since there are some bastards that haven't been banned, we can just keep kicking them if they join.

if you want to ban someone because he is hacker you can report him at a moderator

[JackBlack28]

/sign

[Sovietmaster]

Absolutely not. If you do not like the way the server is run by the admin, find a new server to play on. Simple as that, no need to incite "vote kicking". And besides, this would take away a lot of power from the admin, who actually paid for the server and is letting you use it (they don't have it in un-ranked mode). Lastly, the number of newbies and troll boys out there greatly outnumbers the amount of admins out there, whereas which vote kick would have no effect because most servers don't have 24/7 mod/admin coverage. And besides, if vote kick was engaged then the said troll boys would vote onto kicking out every player that is actually good. Absolutely not...

[BasilPlumley]

(26-07-2011 05:10 AM)Gonobn napisał(a):  Im an AA2(americas army v2.) vet and they had an awesome kick system, it required a server wide vote that had to carry at 80% (yes / no). Also once booted, rejoing the same server was not possible for 5 mins after the VK(vote kick). It would be a huge benifit to the EA owned servers to remove hackers and or idles for a time.

AA3 sucked, an HaVoK be damned!

AA3 is a lot better than 2, 2.5, and 2.8.3 ever were. GunHavok?

[dutchwillsurvive]

/NO
It's used in Crossfire and it sucks so much. People call each other noob all the time and kick each other all the time. It's so stupid.

Unless ofcourse it actually will be made in such a way it can't be abused.

[eimieru25]

It's all up to the person if he wants to abuse something or not and if ever they did, it's their fault that people are suggesting things like this one. Kick all those kill-joys out there.

/sign