Hello There, Guest!

29-05-2012, 04:14 AM | Post: #101
Offline MadHaTT3R 
(28-05-2012 04:03 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 01:22 PM)SpEnSAHH Wrote:  MG36 needs a little bit more recoil, or SOMETHING.

No it doesn´t. Other LMGs need a buff and you are the only thing that need to be nerfed. I suggest to cut off your arms so that you won´t suggest such nonsens anymore.
Sign this if you agree.

OMG A buff on my 249 would be insane.

I dunno about the 36, I guess I get killed by it pretty regular. I wouldnt call it OP though. Then again I dont care what gun YOUR holding, I aim to kill ya.Tongue

[Image: showsig.php?id=48cb9f8ca2d2c2c4720c6253f196fe37]
Quote
29-05-2012, 05:35 AM | Post: #102
Offline SpEnSAHH 
(29-05-2012 04:14 AM)MadHaTT3R Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 04:03 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 01:22 PM)SpEnSAHH Wrote:  MG36 needs a little bit more recoil, or SOMETHING.

No it doesn´t. Other LMGs need a buff and you are the only thing that need to be nerfed. I suggest to cut off your arms so that you won´t suggest such nonsens anymore.
Sign this if you agree.

OMG A buff on my 249 would be insane.

I dunno about the 36, I guess I get killed by it pretty regular. I wouldnt call it OP though. Then again I dont care what gun YOUR holding, I aim to kill ya.Tongue



I've had draw-down situations, SCAR-L vs MG36 at maybe 10m, and it usually wins. Fact is, EVERY round hits, real hard to beat 100% accuracy.



Of course, there could have been damage-enhancing attachments involved in the 10-15 times that's happened.

Quote
29-05-2012, 06:29 AM | Post: #103
Offline mooning_cat 
(29-05-2012 12:31 AM)Vidoks Wrote:  You don't even get the point of an argument.Listen, YOU will never see a balance in any game YOU play, because when you die you'll always think that the enemy had a better weapon than YOU but the biggest problem is... that there will be never a good enough weapon, for players like YOU.

If you'd read the first posts you may have noticed that I dont complain about something that kills me. When playing Assault / Engineer / Recon I never get much problems facing enemy LMGs, mostly cause I would call me a very good Engineer / Recon and a at least good Assault. I just started to play Medic again and noticed that my gun acts like a uber laser beam. In every Battlefield game I totally fail with light machine guns, as a 'range lovin' guy I cant handle that inaccuracy. But the LMGs in Bf:P4f are so fuckin accurate, I shoot down all those camping snipers easily. Got a ~200 meter range kill with my XM8ar yesterday using the Red Dot. Not that it was a lucky shot, just a couple (!!) of bursts to the anti air at [D].

Sorry, but for me a gun with the same damage, a higher rate of fire, way more ammo, about the same recoil and reload time and even more accuracy compared to an assault rifle, that 100% hits with the first bullet at every range looks quite overpowered to me. Especially if its meant to be a supporting weapon.

I dont know about all the LMGs, but those I played more often (XM8ar, MG36, M249, M240b, MG3) are too good compared to assault rifles. The others dont look that much worse..

(This post was last modified: 29-05-2012 06:32 AM by mooning_cat.)
Quote
29-05-2012, 09:31 AM | Post: #104
Offline tnoltil 
(28-05-2012 09:43 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 04:14 PM)AfdsasZ Wrote:  yeah, my Scar-L have BIG problems facing: MP5, MG36, M249, and now even the RPK looks be OP too!

RPK has it´s limits. It´s not the strongest weapons without damage enhancing mag attachments. If you choose those you´d have to conserve ammo as good as possible due to it having only 40 rounds per mag.
If you´d go for the, let´s say casket mag option, you´d get 100 rounds per mag but no advantage damage-wise. In CQC scenarios, that´s where the weapon shines because of it´s awesome hipfire accuracy, you need that extra punch. Therefore CQC ammo would be the best option.

Yet, don´t forget ammunition will be scarce. That´s probably it´s greatest weakness. Also it´s range isn´t the best and the recoil is much higher than on the MG36.

Poor medics with low ammo capacity. Oh wait...
Quote
29-05-2012, 09:40 AM | Post: #105
Offline Healin4ev3r 
RPK is OP? You made me laugh hard.

[Image: xhUzq]

Honey Badger
PTFO
Quote
29-05-2012, 01:01 PM | Post: #106
Offline Stelle 
(29-05-2012 09:31 AM)tnoltil Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 09:43 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 04:14 PM)AfdsasZ Wrote:  yeah, my Scar-L have BIG problems facing: MP5, MG36, M249, and now even the RPK looks be OP too!

RPK has it´s limits. It´s not the strongest weapons without damage enhancing mag attachments. If you choose those you´d have to conserve ammo as good as possible due to it having only 40 rounds per mag.If you´d go for the, let´s say casket mag option, you´d get 100 rounds per mag but no advantage damage-wise. In CQC scenarios, that´s where the weapon shines because of it´s awesome hipfire accuracy, you need that extra punch. Therefore CQC ammo would be the best option.

Yet, don´t forget ammunition will be scarce. That´s probably it´s greatest weakness. Also it´s range isn´t the best and the recoil is much higher than on the MG36.

Poor medics with low ammo capacity. Oh wait...

RPK has the highest amount of ammunition of all the guns in the game so...YOUR ARGUEMENT IS INVALID

Quote
29-05-2012, 01:06 PM | Post: #107
Offline tnoltil 
(29-05-2012 01:01 PM)Stelle Wrote:  
(29-05-2012 09:31 AM)tnoltil Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 09:43 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 04:14 PM)AfdsasZ Wrote:  yeah, my Scar-L have BIG problems facing: MP5, MG36, M249, and now even the RPK looks be OP too!

RPK has it´s limits. It´s not the strongest weapons without damage enhancing mag attachments. If you choose those you´d have to conserve ammo as good as possible due to it having only 40 rounds per mag.If you´d go for the, let´s say casket mag option, you´d get 100 rounds per mag but no advantage damage-wise. In CQC scenarios, that´s where the weapon shines because of it´s awesome hipfire accuracy, you need that extra punch. Therefore CQC ammo would be the best option.

Yet, don´t forget ammunition will be scarce. That´s probably it´s greatest weakness. Also it´s range isn´t the best and the recoil is much higher than on the MG36.

Poor medics with low ammo capacity. Oh wait...

RPK has the highest amount of ammunition of all the guns in the game so...YOUR ARGUEMENT IS INVALID

Seems girls don't know the meaning of sarcasm.
Quote
29-05-2012, 01:43 PM | Post: #108
Online [==C]Elefant 
(29-05-2012 01:01 PM)Stelle Wrote:  
(29-05-2012 09:31 AM)tnoltil Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 09:43 PM)Pannenfahrer Wrote:  
(28-05-2012 04:14 PM)AfdsasZ Wrote:  yeah, my Scar-L have BIG problems facing: MP5, MG36, M249, and now even the RPK looks be OP too!

RPK has it´s limits. It´s not the strongest weapons without damage enhancing mag attachments. If you choose those you´d have to conserve ammo as good as possible due to it having only 40 rounds per mag.If you´d go for the, let´s say casket mag option, you´d get 100 rounds per mag but no advantage damage-wise. In CQC scenarios, that´s where the weapon shines because of it´s awesome hipfire accuracy, you need that extra punch. Therefore CQC ammo would be the best option.

Yet, don´t forget ammunition will be scarce. That´s probably it´s greatest weakness. Also it´s range isn´t the best and the recoil is much higher than on the MG36.

Poor medics with low ammo capacity. Oh wait...

RPK has the highest amount of ammunition of all the guns in the game so...YOUR ARGUEMENT IS INVALID






RPK-M has got 40 rounds per mag and a total amount of 4 mags = 160 rounds
and
M240B has got 90 rounds per mag and a total amount of 2 mags = 180 rounds
Quote



Forum Jump:


WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free requires Windows XP or newer, sorry!
Please upgrade to Internet Explorer 5 or newer.
The 64bit version of Internet Explorer is not currently supported, please use the 32bit version.
Please upgrade to Firefox 1.5 or newer.
Please try Internet Explorer, Firefox or Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free does not currently work with your browser.