Hello There, Guest!

13-03-2012, 03:12 AM | Post: #21
Offline BuckTester 
/no sign

I don't agree with any of it. I'd rather see that they removed the +3 across the board.

I am a Community Moderator, not an Official EA Representative
[Image: jDk2uU]


Submit BL-ban? - Appeal BL-ban!
Quote
13-03-2012, 04:45 AM | Post: #22
Offline WhiteT 
yeah sign
Quote
13-03-2012, 08:50 AM | Post: #23
Offline Strac.CRO 
(13-03-2012 03:12 AM)BuckRaven Wrote:  /no sign

I don't agree with any of it. I'd rather see that they removed the +3 across the board.

Removing +3 across the board to be fair is just like giving every weapon +3 stats.
Do you really want weapons (especially ARs) to be weak as a joke?

(13-03-2012 01:31 AM)GinjaNinja Wrote:  /sign, but they would have to bring in a disadvantages to stop it being OP

that's why I suggested lowering total ammo type damage, maybe even +4+2+2, 2+3+3, +2+2+4 becasue the way it is now if I on my "+3" SAW put: (close-in or heavy or stand-off barrel) + any ammo type + stabilized stock I would be unstoppable, especially by newcommers.
That kind of SAW is more powerful then old legacy SAW, the only thing missing is bullets but 95+95 and a good pistol is more then enough.

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

(This post was last modified: 13-03-2012 08:58 AM by Strac.CRO.)
Quote
13-03-2012, 09:00 AM | Post: #24
Offline BuckTester 
(13-03-2012 08:50 AM)Str1000ac Wrote:  
(13-03-2012 03:12 AM)BuckRaven Wrote:  /no sign

I don't agree with any of it. I'd rather see that they removed the +3 across the board.

Removing +3 across the board to be fair is just like giving every weapon +3 stats.
Do you really want weapons (especially ARs) to be weak as a joke?

This is where our opinions differ. The weapons aren't "weak as joke" I manage perfectly fine with them and I don't see any need for the +3 so removing the +3 weapons from the game would make little to no difference in my opinion. Seeing how the weapon balance is an ongoing project, I don't think 3 extra damage makes a difference either way so I'll just go for the removal of the +3 weapons.

I also think that separating the ammo capacity/damage attachments only serves one purpose, forcing players to purchase more attachments. Deciding whether you want more damage or more ammunition is something that everybody has to do and depending on your play style, no choice is necessarily better than any other.

I am a Community Moderator, not an Official EA Representative
[Image: jDk2uU]


Submit BL-ban? - Appeal BL-ban!
Quote
13-03-2012, 09:16 AM | Post: #25
Offline Strac.CRO 
@ BuckRaven ... well they said they introduced customization and +3 weapons for balance purpose (we know it's money related, not balance). The way it is now it's everything but balance.
I am either OP or UP (try basic 150 credits AN94 Abakan).

P.S. +3 and more ammo makes a difference.

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

(This post was last modified: 13-03-2012 09:16 AM by Strac.CRO.)
Quote
13-03-2012, 09:53 AM | Post: #26
Offline BuckTester 
I constantly play with the M4A1 which, correct me if I'm wrong, is often complained about. I have no problem playing with it unmodified to be honest, with some attachments it just gets a bit easier, nothing OP about it. Sure, some of the weapons could use some minor tweaks but beyond that, they're fine (shotguns/pistols excluded).

In my opinion, as I said, I don't think the +3 makes all that much of a difference as people tend to say.

I've tried pretty much all weapons (SVD and the XM8-series being the only exceptions since I never liked them) since the update and I really don't have anywhere remotely as much problems as people claim. It's all about adjusting how you play to be honest.

I am a Community Moderator, not an Official EA Representative
[Image: jDk2uU]


Submit BL-ban? - Appeal BL-ban!
(This post was last modified: 13-03-2012 09:54 AM by BuckTester.)
Quote
13-03-2012, 04:17 PM | Post: #27
Offline dokk1e_1. 
(13-03-2012 01:31 AM)GinjaNinja Wrote:  /sign, but they would have to bring in a disadvantages to stop it being OP

your signature is way to big
Quote
13-03-2012, 04:21 PM | Post: #28
Offline Fenderalac 
/sign, not gonna happen.

[Image: b2AU0.png]
Quote
13-03-2012, 06:58 PM | Post: #29
Offline Strac.CRO 
(13-03-2012 04:21 PM)Fenderalac Wrote:  /sign, not gonna happen.

why not? Is it so hard to split ammo customization?

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

Quote
02-04-2012, 09:13 PM | Post: #30
Offline Strac.CRO 
just a bump

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

Quote
02-04-2012, 09:16 PM | Post: #31
Offline CybalA 
/sign

Quote
03-04-2012, 01:04 PM | Post: #32
Offline GinjaNinja 
(13-03-2012 04:17 PM)dokk1e_1. Wrote:  
(13-03-2012 01:31 AM)GinjaNinja Wrote:  /sign, but they would have to bring in a disadvantages to stop it being OP

your signature is way to big

It's as big as it can beRolleyes

[Image: ginja.png]
Quote
25-05-2012, 07:49 PM | Post: #33
Offline Hmmmmmmm 
/antisign
It would destroy the object of customization if everything does the same thing.

[Image: zzx9.jpg]

Quote
26-05-2012, 05:35 AM | Post: #34
Offline Strac.CRO 
(25-05-2012 07:49 PM)Hmmmmmmm Wrote:  /antisign
It would destroy the object of customization if everything does the same thing.

they did it with viper ammo attachment = it adds more damage and adds few more bullets in mag

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

Quote
26-05-2012, 06:46 AM | Post: #35
Offline irfanGF 
/sign /sign /sign

PP19+casket mag+cqc mag+close in barrel+stabilized stock Big Grin

Quote
26-05-2012, 09:13 AM | Post: #36
Offline AntiBooster 
/unsigned , scar l/ aek + casket+ viper = 42 bullets and 25 damage min at long range. Very very unfair for the less paying people.
Quote
26-05-2012, 05:59 PM | Post: #37
Offline Strac.CRO 
(26-05-2012 09:13 AM)AntiBooster Wrote:  /unsigned , scar l/ aek + casket+ viper = 42 bullets and 25 damage min at long range. Very very unfair for the less paying people.

I suggested it before VIPER ammo.

[Image: journeyv.jpg]

Quote
27-05-2012, 01:29 PM | Post: #38
Offline GinjaNinja 
(13-03-2012 08:50 AM)Str1000ac Wrote:  
(13-03-2012 01:31 AM)GinjaNinja Wrote:  /sign, but they would have to bring in a disadvantages to stop it being OP

that's why I suggested lowering total ammo type damage, maybe even +4+2+2, 2+3+3, +2+2+4 becasue the way it is now if I on my "+3" SAW put: (close-in or heavy or stand-off barrel) + any ammo type + stabilized stock I would be unstoppable, especially by newcommers.
That kind of SAW is more powerful then old legacy SAW, the only thing missing is bullets but 95+95 and a good pistol is more then enough.

I was thinking like cqc ammo being less accurate/ less bullet speed, but doing high damage

[Image: ginja.png]
Quote
27-05-2012, 02:04 PM | Post: #39
Offline AllahUga 
- add +3+3+3 damage and "+3" ammo to all weapons, not only to legacy, to make game more fair for newcomers, give Soft Point, Tactical stock and/or Heavy barrel for free to "legacy" owners as a compensation
- make "ammo-type"'s total damage 10 = +5+3+2, +3+4+3, +2+3+5 or similar'

[Image: 36470m.jpg]

This signature has been removed by RIC0H due to it containing swearing
Quote
09-07-2012, 04:20 PM | Post: #40
Offline Dicot 
(07-02-2012 08:51 PM)Str1000ac Wrote:  split ammo customization parts in 2 different buyable options:

1. ammo type (CQC, Soft Point, Hi-power Ammo)
2. ammo magazines type (Casket Mags, High Capacity Mags, Extra Magazines)

this will also bring EAsy more money because people can now by 2 things instead of one

edit:
- add +3+3+3 damage and "+3" ammo to all weapons, not only to legacy, to make game more fair for newcomers, give Soft Point, Tactical stock and/or Heavy barrel for free to "legacy" owners as a compensation
- make "ammo-type"'s total damage 10 = +5+3+2, +3+4+3, +2+3+5 or similar
Dont give them cookies str1000 !

Proud to be Romanian !
Quote



Forum Jump:


WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free requires Windows XP or newer, sorry!
Please upgrade to Internet Explorer 5 or newer.
The 64bit version of Internet Explorer is not currently supported, please use the 32bit version.
Please upgrade to Firefox 1.5 or newer.
Please try Internet Explorer, Firefox or Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free does not currently work with your browser.