Hello There, Guest!

07-02-2012, 04:23 PM | Post: #301
Offline WaylandH 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

No what would be fair would be to give at least replacement attachments for those that were removed.

Anything else is beyond disgusting.
Quote
07-02-2012, 04:51 PM | Post: #302
Online da85bears 
Silvanoshi,

How can you say that the +3 is fair under the new ballanced guidelines, yet your willing to see us all the stuff that was part of our weapons "forever" again, and create the imagined imballance again.
(This post was last modified: 15-01-2013 12:03 AM by da85bears.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 05:04 PM | Post: #303
Offline AJoao611
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

BOOST! BOOST! BOOST!

It's NOT fair, just like the legacy attachments weren't because we have an OP advantage over the others! Yes, +3 dmg and bigger mags are OP imo because others can NOT have it! Wouldn't it be a lot better if we could get at least just 1 perma attachment? That would be balanced...
Quote
07-02-2012, 05:41 PM | Post: #304
Offline Ghostrider0067 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

What a completely typical, cowardly, cop out response.

You guys PERMANENTLY hosed the game and aren't willing to accept the fact that to be so. You can call what you've done fair all you want, but we know the truth in what it is: BULL$HIT.

[Image: 391560_4337901687061_1154472848_n.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2012 05:42 PM by Ghostrider0067.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 05:58 PM | Post: #305
Offline misssska 
(07-02-2012 05:41 PM)Ghostrider0067 Wrote:  
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

What a completely typical, cowardly, cop out response.

You guys PERMANENTLY hosed the game and aren't willing to accept the fact that to be so. You can call what you've done fair all you want, but we know the truth in what it is: BULL$HIT.

n sry silva...but now we are after that u released the permanent attachments
so what the f**** are u talkin about????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
n if i buy the new attachments for good for my +3 weapons...im gana be more op than before.....is that right??

[Image: Untitled123_www.kepfeltoltes.hu_.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2012 06:01 PM by misssska.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 06:06 PM | Post: #306
Offline XkSAssassin 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

Well,listen Silvanoshi,I'm not +3 weapons owner (oh sorry,only one +3 weapon,but I havent used even when there wasn't any modifications and even with +3 still haven't) ,but it's not fair how you say. I know,most people are now newbies and it will be hard for them,but,people have used to love your company,your game,they spend more than 300$ on your game (in my country you can buy i5 processor with that money) ,but still it's not fair. Even I haven't spent any money on this game,and not +3 weapons owner like: "Oh,+3 owners have bad weapons!Well,I don't have much,only one,but even I don't use that weapon,so I don't care!" ,I still think it's not fair!

You community guys still need to think what you are doing.

I still do. (This post was last modified: 07-02-2012 06:07 PM by XkSAssassin.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 06:36 PM | Post: #307
Offline Parrina 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

Coward!

Ripping you off since Dec.2011.Its the Sleasy way!
Quote
07-02-2012, 06:38 PM | Post: #308
Offline xJaegermeisterx 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

I feel that's really offensive comment. Sorry Silvanoshi but WHO except for you feels +3 is fair ? It's an unfair advantage for legacy owners. And from Legacy owners perspective, we were still robbed and got NOTHING except a few more bullets and a little extra money for our money.
If we're talking about fair, free permanent attachments would be adequate compensation for me, and would make me consider buying stuff for the game again. From your post it seems obvious that's not going to happen. If that's true, there are other games to spend my money on.
Quote
07-02-2012, 07:52 PM | Post: #309
Offline XDDante 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

im sorry???but what performance???ooohhh let me see huge bullet drop on M95???high recoil on VSS Vintorez???is that what you call fair and it's a compensation???damn i must be very stupid to not notice that just "3" damage points it'gonna make up for the money i spend on this game,it wasn't much (40 Dlls)but if knew from the beggining that your team would be doing this i wouldn't played and instead i would bought a Battlefield 3 copy...im just sticking around mostly for boredom,to be honest,just waiting for a better game to come, and becuase i wanted to see if you would make the right decision on compensate us...but since you already answered my question i don't think i have nothing to do with this game now im just losing my time...

[Image: showsig.php?id=68037e91858867d756e9cb16c0822e2f]
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2012 08:05 PM by XDDante.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 08:08 PM | Post: #310
Offline .theCr0w. 
(07-02-2012 07:52 PM)XDDante Wrote:  ...but since you already answered my question i don't think i have nothing to do with this game now im just losing my time...

I'm here to see what is going on and generally generate as bad picture of EAsy as it is possible.
Warning newcomers not to buy BFs, revealing Dec 20 scam, etc

recon - lv30 | assault - lv29 | engineer - lv20

I STRONGLY advise anyone NOT TO BUY any Funds even if it seems to be reasonable to. For obvious reasons details are HERE.
Remember, remember 20th of December ...
Quote
07-02-2012, 08:13 PM | Post: #311
Offline InForTheKill 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi
You are welcome to explain the "fair" part in your response.
Quote
07-02-2012, 08:16 PM | Post: #312
Offline InForTheKill 
Anyway this is probably another scamming attempt.
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2012 08:16 PM by InForTheKill.)
Quote
07-02-2012, 08:27 PM | Post: #313
Offline JoMedicNutz
Are these new attachments as permanent and the permanent weapons you took from me last time?

im still not going to re-install

Battlefield fail4free

give me my money back and ill stop
Quote
07-02-2012, 11:17 PM | Post: #314
Offline hittmen0t 
LOL, someone is getting decidedly frantic now. Directly after introducing perm attachments we have the first supersaver packages *yawn*. I may be repeating myself, but if you guys hadn't stolen my good stuff I might be interested..... this way it's worth no more than a shrug.

Summing it all up:
.:Camper:. Wrote:Nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf nerf. Oh hello EAsy

[Image: EAfailed.png]
Quote
07-02-2012, 11:18 PM | Post: #315
Offline Fenderalac 
hah smart, you need to unlock it first, and then you have to buy it.... kinda doesnt make any sence Dodgy

[Image: b2AU0.png]
Quote
07-02-2012, 11:57 PM | Post: #316
Offline eXchance9 
(07-02-2012 11:18 PM)Fenderalac Wrote:  hah smart, you need to unlock it first, and then you have to buy it.... kinda doesnt make any sence Dodgy

lol, dude thats normal. this system is in other games to like in combat arms, a.v.a, blacklight retribution...its so awesome Big Grin

Quote
08-02-2012, 04:21 AM | Post: #317
Offline XDDante 
look im no finance analyst or whatever,i just like to play videogames period,but you don't need to be that inteligent to figure actual situation for the game...let me start off with

1.-recent change on game to put up permanent attachements was made no to please "+3" players but instead was to look good with "new players"(even though it's was us the 1% player angry players at them, the ones making this suggestion,correct me if i am wrong) ...why???well that's obvious.

2.-they gonna keep this "change" untill they notice again that they're not getting revenue because people are not spending more money on buying new weapons,attchments,etc...

3.-but there's a catch,they cannot pull the:"bait and switch"again cause i would just show off again the type of people they are...

4.-so im not sure how they gonna keep revenues from the game without having to pull off permanet attachments,since they don't offer,new maps,new guns,not even new vehicles to keep players interested...

so yes there you have it my humble opinion on this whole nosense game...

[Image: showsig.php?id=68037e91858867d756e9cb16c0822e2f]
(This post was last modified: 08-02-2012 05:35 AM by XDDante.)
Quote
08-02-2012, 04:24 AM | Post: #318
Offline Ghostrider0067 
(08-02-2012 04:21 AM)XDDante Wrote:  look im no finance analist or whatever...

Good lord, I hope not. Tongue

There's a significant difference between ANALYST and what you wrote. If you're not sure how to spell something in English, use dictionary.com or something similar.

Just sayin'.

[Image: 391560_4337901687061_1154472848_n.jpg]
Quote
08-02-2012, 04:30 AM | Post: #319
Offline JuniorJr 
(07-02-2012 11:55 AM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 10:40 PM)XDDante Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 05:22 PM)c2-BlackAdder Wrote:  
(06-02-2012 01:25 PM)misssska Wrote:  silvanoshi...why cant u answer to XDDantes question???
its a disclimination...u r answering only nooob questions..........

That says it all realy.
yeah is also noticed myself that Silvanoshi is only answering to his convenience...he only reads and answers as long as the question has nothing to do with refund for "+3" users,how despicable...
I have answered this on a number of occasions before. There are no plans to refund those who received +3 weapons. The +3 weapons provide the performance boost within the current game balance that is felt to be fair.

Silvanoshi

ALRIGHT I'M FUCKING TIRED OF ALL YOUR ********. This is FUCKING extortion, there is NO SO CALLED "FAIRNESS", this BS needs to be reported. Silvanoshi for what's left of your DIGNITY AND INTEGRITY OR whatever you call it, don't spit in our faces and call it fair. Go ahead and delete this comment for perhaps "Raging", remember you have a choice to have a concise and a heart.

[Image: BFAAT.png]
Quote
08-02-2012, 04:35 AM | Post: #320
Offline JuniorJr 
WOW nice filter Silvanoshi, you've won A battle, but you better be ready to kiss an a** if you think you'll be saved. Big Grin

[Image: BFAAT.png]
Quote



Forum Jump:


WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free requires Windows XP or newer, sorry!
Please upgrade to Internet Explorer 5 or newer.
The 64bit version of Internet Explorer is not currently supported, please use the 32bit version.
Please upgrade to Firefox 1.5 or newer.
Please try Internet Explorer, Firefox or Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free does not currently work with your browser.