Hello There, Guest!

08-12-2011, 10:05 PM | Post: #41
Offline Ronaldomu07 
/sign

Moderator HomeSen edit:
Max. size for the full signature can not exceed 250 pixels in height and/or 900 pixels in width. This includes images, text, quotes and links. Maximum combined size may not exceed 500KB. Please read the FORUM RULES before posting a new one.

http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/7349/sigua.jpg
Quote
08-12-2011, 10:07 PM | Post: #42
Online 303ConArtist 
Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...

Quote
08-12-2011, 10:08 PM | Post: #43
Offline Georgievski 
/sign
see some mortar spamming though...
Quote
08-12-2011, 10:23 PM | Post: #44
Offline Gandler 
/sign

I love Backstab. It would be perfect for this game.
Quote
08-12-2011, 10:26 PM | Post: #45
Offline Billybob121 
/sign

yes yes yes. this map would be awesome!!!!!!!

Quote
08-12-2011, 10:28 PM | Post: #46
Offline Gandler 
(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...
but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.
Quote
08-12-2011, 10:29 PM | Post: #47
Offline Zeroemd123 
/sign
Quote
09-12-2011, 01:02 AM | Post: #48
Offline k9catforce 
/sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed

[Image: bfp4fnewsig.jpg]
Quote
09-12-2011, 04:06 AM | Post: #49
Offline Gandler 
(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed
I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

Quote
09-12-2011, 04:13 AM | Post: #50
Offline MysterB 
/Sign
Quote
09-12-2011, 04:47 AM | Post: #51
Offline Johnysnake 
(08-12-2011 10:28 PM)Gandler Wrote:  
(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...
but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.

Hmm... Well, i have been thinking about the same...
Using the word "Epic" in your title, could be considered as a "Attention seeker". But what if the thread is "Epic"? Or is that just a personal opinion? Can you use the word "Epic" when it is better, unusually or more impressive then others? I´m not sure... I just think, that i´ve created something that you have not seen on this forums before. Imo, that´s kinda "Epic".
But don´t get me wrong. I´m willing to tell everyone how to do it or even write a guide about it. I just used the word "Epic" because it think it is kinda "Epic".



(09-12-2011 04:06 AM)Gandler Wrote:  
(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed
I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

Originaly, the russian (MEC) forces had 2 Hinds (MI-24, attack choppers) and a BMP-2 (IFV) as main vehicles. The US forces had 2 M1A2 Abrams tanks and a M6 Linebacker (mobile AA) to counter the russian (MEC) air forces + IFV.

Backstab was by far one of the most balanced maps with such a difference in forces (air vs ground). This also made this map one of the most epic maps ever created, with 2 totally different teams.

I just added a little bird and 2 havoc´s as example. If the M6 Linebacker would be added to the game, a little bird would not be necessary. But untill today we don´t have skills to pilot a AA vehicle. So without a mobile AA, we need something to counter the 2 Havoc´s or 2 MI-24´s. A Littlebird and a couple stationary AA´s would be a solution. Also keep in mind that we have more powerfull RPG´s today in BFP4F then back in BF2:MC.

But that´s just a thought. Feel free to add your own idea´s. Wink


Quote
09-12-2011, 05:33 AM | Post: #52
Offline ::TeRminaToR:: 
/Sign
Quote
09-12-2011, 05:36 AM | Post: #53
Offline ShadeyTex2.1 
/Sign I want something like Karkand but on a much larger scale or so and air vehicles (Everyone wants that Tongue) I like the video too.

[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSFyV9dYoj6HJSAVZVeInT...YnWtWGv9Kg]
I got all types of ammo.
Quote
09-12-2011, 05:40 AM | Post: #54
Offline Healin4ev3r 
a huge /sign from me, although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 Smile . I don't want to get r4ped that way Rolleyes

[Image: xhUzq]

Honey Badger
PTFO
Quote
09-12-2011, 05:44 AM | Post: #55
Offline Johnysnake 
(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ... although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 Smile . I don't want to get r4ped that way Rolleyes

Lol, that is artillery, similar to the current mortar strikes with booster. So you will feel no difference. Big Grin


Quote
09-12-2011, 05:54 AM | Post: #56
Offline Healin4ev3r 
(09-12-2011 05:44 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  
(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ... although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 Smile . I don't want to get r4ped that way Rolleyes

Lol, that is artillery, similar to the current mortar strikes with booster.
[Image: 600px-No_sign.svg.png]
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2011 05:57 AM by Healin4ev3r.)
Quote
09-12-2011, 06:18 AM | Post: #57
Offline Gandler 
(09-12-2011 04:47 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  
(08-12-2011 10:28 PM)Gandler Wrote:  
(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...
but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.

Hmm... Well, i have been thinking about the same...
Using the word "Epic" in your title, could be considered as a "Attention seeker". But what if the thread is "Epic"? Or is that just a personal opinion? Can you use the word "Epic" when it is better, unusually or more impressive then others? I´m not sure... I just think, that i´ve created something that you have not seen on this forums before. Imo, that´s kinda "Epic".
But don´t get me wrong. I´m willing to tell everyone how to do it or even write a guide about it. I just used the word "Epic" because it think it is kinda "Epic".



(09-12-2011 04:06 AM)Gandler Wrote:  
(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed
I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

Originaly, the russian (MEC) forces had 2 Hinds (MI-24, attack choppers) and a BMP-2 (IFV) as main vehicles. The US forces had 2 M1A2 Abrams tanks and a M6 Linebacker (mobile AA) to counter the russian (MEC) air forces + IFV.

Backstab was by far one of the most balanced maps with such a difference in forces (air vs ground). This also made this map one of the most epic maps ever created, with 2 totally different teams.

I just added a little bird and 2 havoc´s as example. If the M6 Linebacker would be added to the game, a little bird would not be necessary. But untill today we don´t have skills to pilot a AA vehicle. So without a mobile AA, we need something to counter the 2 Havoc´s or 2 MI-24´s. A Littlebird and a couple stationary AA´s would be a solution. Also keep in mind that we have more powerfull RPG´s today in BFP4F then back in BF2:MC.

But that´s just a thought. Feel free to add your own idea´s. Wink
that is a good point. I completely forgot about the mobile AA.

Quote
09-12-2011, 06:25 AM | Post: #58
Offline Johnysnake 
(09-12-2011 05:54 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  
(09-12-2011 05:44 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  
(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ...
... current mortar strikes with booster.
[Image: 600pxnosignsvg.png]

(06-12-2011 05:46 PM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  The dominance of Mortar Strike is something we're looking at folks...

Silvanoshi

It won´t last forever. Don´t worry. Wink


Quote
09-12-2011, 12:25 PM | Post: #59
Offline Nirvash 
I /sign. BF2MC was one of my first shooters. We cant let that stuff die out in the digital dust with the games servers

Quote
09-12-2011, 12:34 PM | Post: #60
Offline [TNB]PWN3D^^ 
/sign
Quote



Forum Jump:


WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free requires Windows XP or newer, sorry!
Please upgrade to Internet Explorer 5 or newer.
The 64bit version of Internet Explorer is not currently supported, please use the 32bit version.
Please upgrade to Firefox 1.5 or newer.
Please try Internet Explorer, Firefox or Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free does not currently work with your browser.