[Maps] We ♥ Backstab (1000+ Supporters)

[Ronaldomu07]

/sign

[303ConArtist]

Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...

[Georgievski]

/sign
see some mortar spamming though...

[Gandler]

/sign

I love Backstab. It would be perfect for this game.

[Billybob121]

/sign

yes yes yes. this map would be awesome!!!!!!!

[Gandler]

(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...

but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.

[Zeroemd123]

/sign

[k9catforce]

/sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed

[Gandler]

(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed

I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

[MysterB]

/Sign

[Johnysnake]

(08-12-2011 10:28 PM)Gandler Wrote:  

(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...

but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.

Hmm... Well, i have been thinking about the same...
Using the word "Epic" in your title, could be considered as a "Attention seeker". But what if the thread is "Epic"? Or is that just a personal opinion? Can you use the word "Epic" when it is better, unusually or more impressive then others? I´m not sure... I just think, that i´ve created something that you have not seen on this forums before. Imo, that´s kinda "Epic".
But don´t get me wrong. I´m willing to tell everyone how to do it or even write a guide about it. I just used the word "Epic" because it think it is kinda "Epic".

(09-12-2011 04:06 AM)Gandler Wrote:  

(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed

I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

Originaly, the russian (MEC) forces had 2 Hinds (MI-24, attack choppers) and a BMP-2 (IFV) as main vehicles. The US forces had 2 M1A2 Abrams tanks and a M6 Linebacker (mobile AA) to counter the russian (MEC) air forces + IFV.

Backstab was by far one of the most balanced maps with such a difference in forces (air vs ground). This also made this map one of the most epic maps ever created, with 2 totally different teams.

I just added a little bird and 2 havoc´s as example. If the M6 Linebacker would be added to the game, a little bird would not be necessary. But untill today we don´t have skills to pilot a AA vehicle. So without a mobile AA, we need something to counter the 2 Havoc´s or 2 MI-24´s. A Littlebird and a couple stationary AA´s would be a solution. Also keep in mind that we have more powerfull RPG´s today in BFP4F then back in BF2:MC.

But that´s just a thought. Feel free to add your own idea´s.

[::TeRminaToR::]

/Sign

[ShadeyTex2.1]

/Sign I want something like Karkand but on a much larger scale or so and air vehicles (Everyone wants that ) I like the video too.

[Healin4ev3r]

a huge /sign from me, although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 . I don't want to get r4ped that way

[Johnysnake]

(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ... although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 . I don't want to get r4ped that way

Lol, that is artillery, similar to the current mortar strikes with booster. So you will feel no difference.

[Healin4ev3r]

(09-12-2011 05:44 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  

(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ... although I'm not sure if I want that thing at 1:28 . I don't want to get r4ped that way

Lol, that is artillery, similar to the current mortar strikes with booster.

[Gandler]

(09-12-2011 04:47 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  

(08-12-2011 10:28 PM)Gandler Wrote:  

(08-12-2011 10:07 PM)303ConArtist Wrote:  Epic suggestion? Attention seeker...

but it is an epic suggestion and the time he spent on making this thread makes it worthy of an epic title.

Hmm... Well, i have been thinking about the same...
Using the word "Epic" in your title, could be considered as a "Attention seeker". But what if the thread is "Epic"? Or is that just a personal opinion? Can you use the word "Epic" when it is better, unusually or more impressive then others? I´m not sure... I just think, that i´ve created something that you have not seen on this forums before. Imo, that´s kinda "Epic".
But don´t get me wrong. I´m willing to tell everyone how to do it or even write a guide about it. I just used the word "Epic" because it think it is kinda "Epic".

(09-12-2011 04:06 AM)Gandler Wrote:  

(09-12-2011 01:02 AM)k9catforce Wrote:  /sign, but why does the RU get 2 attack choppers while the US only get 1 littlebird? the Littlebird got nerfed

I actually just noticed that myself as well. I did not look at his map carefully on the first read. I am curious his reasoning, I personally think it would be better if the U.S. got 2 Apaches.
But maybe Johnny can shed some light on why he did this?????

Originaly, the russian (MEC) forces had 2 Hinds (MI-24, attack choppers) and a BMP-2 (IFV) as main vehicles. The US forces had 2 M1A2 Abrams tanks and a M6 Linebacker (mobile AA) to counter the russian (MEC) air forces + IFV.

Backstab was by far one of the most balanced maps with such a difference in forces (air vs ground). This also made this map one of the most epic maps ever created, with 2 totally different teams.

I just added a little bird and 2 havoc´s as example. If the M6 Linebacker would be added to the game, a little bird would not be necessary. But untill today we don´t have skills to pilot a AA vehicle. So without a mobile AA, we need something to counter the 2 Havoc´s or 2 MI-24´s. A Littlebird and a couple stationary AA´s would be a solution. Also keep in mind that we have more powerfull RPG´s today in BFP4F then back in BF2:MC.

But that´s just a thought. Feel free to add your own idea´s.

that is a good point. I completely forgot about the mobile AA.

[Johnysnake]

(09-12-2011 05:54 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  

(09-12-2011 05:44 AM)Johnysnake Wrote:  

(09-12-2011 05:40 AM)Healin4ev3r Wrote:  ...

... current mortar strikes with booster.

(06-12-2011 05:46 PM)Silvanoshi Wrote:  The dominance of Mortar Strike is something we're looking at folks...

Silvanoshi

It won´t last forever. Don´t worry.

[Nirvash]

I /sign. BF2MC was one of my first shooters. We cant let that stuff die out in the digital dust with the games servers

[[TNB]PWN3D^^]

/sign