Rate the signature above you 3.0

[DeeDaniel]

DDJD Are you in the Forsaken?? :O
OT: 6/10
[/quote]

Yep

OT: 8/10

[[GK]SnipeStrike]

Oke haha welcome to he clan
OT: 9/10

[jusper]

(01-10-2011 10:45 AM)DDJD Wrote:  

(01-10-2011 01:13 AM)jusper Wrote:  

(01-10-2011 01:05 AM)SkyDog13 Wrote:  3/10
The soldier looks weird smiling, no border, bad font with the white background, and overall just nothing that impressive.

4/10 for your sig. It is completely unpersonal (as in it could be anyones signature) and it has one of them "oh-so-cool" slogans. But I like the colours and the image itslef.
the font is verdana.... and the soldier is zergface. If you don't know zergface, you do not have the necessary preqrequirements to properly assess my signature.

He is mad that you gave him a 3/1o..

OT: 8/1o

I'm not mad.
However, I think a signature should be personal and serve as essentially something that distinguishes you from others. Thus, an image of a guy in a gasmask with your name on it can look as good as it may, but apart from the name, it is exchangeable.
I am however very open to critique regarding fonts and basic layout (the Zergface will NEVER go though).

EDIT: imageshack seems to b down?

(01-10-2011 01:16 PM)0x5b;GK0x5d;SnipeStrike Wrote:  Oke haha welcome to he clan
OT: 9/10

5/10

[cpt.stone]

0/10 no sig

[jusper]

(01-10-2011 02:50 PM)cpt.stone Wrote:  0/10 no sig

imageshack wont load my sig

[SkyDog13]

0/10
No sig, and what do you mean by it is not personal? I am really not understanding what you mean, or why you gave SnipeStrike a 5/10...

[Healin4ev3r]

^ your sig file is corrupted .

New epic sig by awesome Flynn xD

Edit : Ninja'd . 10/10 for you, but I prefer the sig with dog and sky

[jusper]

(01-10-2011 02:53 PM)SkyDog13 Wrote:  0/10
No sig, and what do you mean by it is not personal? I am really not understanding what you mean, or why you gave SnipeStrike a 5/10...

Take for example exair's signature.
The images he chose to go with his names are perfectly suited.
Healing4ever's sig (7/10 btw) also highlights his name/what he likes to do.
Yours on the other hand is just completely arbitrary. SnipeStrike's got a 5/10 because it looked unexciting.
I chose Zerg because he looks funny and I thought it would be a funnyish picture to use in a signature for a shooter. As for the layout, I am not experienced, I just wanted to have a sig and get some input on it.

But yeah, pleas don't take anything I say as more than a personal opinion, but I think that not only the looks matter, but also the message you get across.

[303ConArtist]

5/10

[raptor_jesus]

6/10

@healin4ev3r nice lookin new sig!! it resembles the old one just enough/not too much

[DeeDaniel]

3/1o
That scary soldier..
The weapons images are to little, the names dont have a nice font
and its ruined by the white background.
btw, make a outline on your sig it makes it better

[SkyDog13]

10/10
Hey... wait a sec.... Isn't it the 303RD, not 303th...

[raptor_jesus]

above was ninjad - i hope lol

on topic: 7.5/10

[.fLynn.]

=

better use the second sig
ps: above 10/10

[Tobias]

bahaha X'D 10/10

[Healin4ev3r]

10/10 but... why do everyone use BF3 theme

[Tobias]

Because it's a great game? Dunno. 100/10

[jusper]

Why "Albert"?
7/10

[Akantokiller]

10/10 because of the face!

[Sgt.Sullivan]

7/10