Battlefield Play4Free

You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
(09-06-2011 10:49 AM)Nurse_Betty Wrote: [ -> ]The map makers have a cheek to name it after an IRAQI town also? Why?
Perhaps to remind us how many innocent people have died at the hands of western forces?

Really unimpressed............

Ya cus no innocent civilians in that country died at the hands of their own rulers.....

Really unimpressed.......with your ignorance
(09-06-2011 06:41 PM)Ime34 Wrote: [ -> ]why is everybody complaining yo?

If you don't like this new map, or sharqi because there are no vehicles, then DONT play.

WOW just WOW!

Why is the majority complaining...think about it, HOW many FPS games are out in existence (especially FREE) that have what BATTLEFIELD BATTLEFIELD BATTLEFIELD offers and the way it offers it......................that's right, not many if any.

There are DOZENS/TONS of IO games that are superior to this game b/c this game SHOULD focus on what BATTLEFIELD does best..........making a BATTLEFIELD. Not Counter-Strike, not Call of Duty, not SOCOM, not WARZONE, not BRINK, not etc. etc. Do you see????????? How is it that FPS players cannot realize that there are not many full-scare FPS games??????????

This is why when a company releases a game (no one made them) called BATTLEFIELD, most by default are going to assume BATTLEFIELD. If I want to play IO games there are plenty of superior games to this Sharqi/Basra garbage. Don't get me wrong I don't mind an IO map BUT at this time this game should have Karkand, Oman, Basra, and another VEHICLE (doesn't have to be jets but at least helo) map. No way should a BATTLEFIELD game currently have a 2/2 rotation when only 1/4 is a full scale BF map.

Of course if we don't like it we don't play it, what do you think people are doing right now????? BUT we can and will complain and voice are opinions so that the dev team can understand what direction they SHOULD take versus the one they are for some god awful reason taking at the moment ESPECIALLY when there's no much time left before other far more superior games release (this fall) and nearly take this game off the map altogether (especially if they don't get their direction right).

As you said; I for one currently don't play BFP4F at all until I see a version that consist of more BF style maps!!!
Good map! but... boring game mode for the map :/ the rounds are way to fast... imo
I understand that if you have too many "vehicle" maps in this game it may affect people buying weapons but c'mon!! Another map with no vehicles!!??! Shame on you! Basra is a campfest. Bring your marshmallows for the campfire!!
RIP Battlefield ;/
Where are the vehicles?? MASSIVE FAIL
Basra is nothing to special...... i didn't understand why not Mashtur City has veichles and a lot of Urban enviroment
This Is Awesome But We Actully Want More Maps In The Actual Game There Like 4 Maps That Ok


Add Me JoshYukon
This Is Awesome But We Actully Want More Maps In The Actual Game There Like 4 Maps That Ok


Add Me JoshYukon
(09-06-2011 10:08 AM)LT.Tanaka Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2011 10:02 AM)MeccTol Wrote: [ -> ]We want more levels like OMAN, sharqui and basra are crap!!!!!!!!

level like sharqi are the best cause they seem to be the only maps that team work really shines, in oman ppl are to worked up in getting into a jet or apache they forget about teamwork...

vehicle maps are good, but if there was a training mode that person had to pass to be able to even qualify to drive a vehicle i wudnt mind maps like oman


i Agree .. with you. I think we should get more small maps they show alot bettter of teamwork
It's de new map wonder the best!
(09-06-2011 10:09 AM)Ltd_Zielesny Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-06-2011 10:02 AM)MeccTol Wrote: [ -> ]We want more levels like OMAN, sharqui and basra are crap!!!!!!!!

This is your oppinion, not everyone's oppinion. Keep that in mind.
I don't like jets and helicopters.
Greetz

well maybe you should keep in mind this is battlefield. if you don't like the jets helos and vehicle maps in general than go play somethign else. people that complane about inf maps are people who know what makes battlefield special.
(09-06-2011 10:06 PM)Soldier-of-BaL Wrote: [ -> ]Where are the vehicles?? MASSIVE FAIL

i agree this "game" is not battlefield.
(09-06-2011 10:06 AM)BENSHERMAN Wrote: [ -> ]MORE MAPS LIKE OMAN! WITH JETS AND HELI!

basra sucks .. i like oman more than all the fcking another maps
is this the end of battlefield ????

i think that i remove my acount ...

like maps where all jets cars snipers posts etc. thats more like play battlefield
is this the end of battlefield ????

i think that i remove my acount ...

like maps where all jets cars snipers posts etc. thats more like play battlefield
Even though I'm a fan of the Oman maps, I agree with this map, because teamwork excist here not like oman..
dont like it bad connection when i play there
Basra is very good map. I think that this is the best location in game.

Good Job and good luck in creating new maps Smile Cya Tongue
(09-06-2011 09:20 PM)Broadhead Wrote: [ -> ]Basra's great. But it's too easy to completely suppress the US base. Once RU has all 4 flags, they can circle the US Base spawn area and choke it off completely - I've already had three games today that have been total un-fun washouts because of this. Overall though, yeah, it is an awesome map!

My vote for the next map would be Road to Jalalabad - I think that's it. It had a bridge over a river leading to a large, open public square, and a kind of open petrol station area on the other side. Lots of cluttered, tight streets opening into large plazas and stuff. Had tanks and hummers too iirc.


The map you are describing is Mashtuur City it had all the land vehicles and helos, although Road to Jalalabad wich had the same recipe wouldn't be at all a bad acquisition to BFP4F, they were both epic maps.. one can only hope ^^

And aye Basra seems a rush fest and the US base is in fact overwhelmed, imo the flags should be more apart from each other allowing a bit more of intermediate skirmishes before the goal instead of a simple tug o war based on soldier numbers on a certain point of the map, alot of areas of the map will never be used due to that fact , would only add a few more climbable structures , aside the elevated parking lot only found so far a ladder to get on top of a building ( and the visibility aint that big of a woop ) behind flag A, and one cant even defend the flag from there as there's a building in the middle ^^.

Regarding the elevated parking lot its kinda funny to see at least 4 snipers in a row on the top floor , its either due to the fact that there aint another position for them or they don't know it yet ^^

Bring on Mashtuur or even Jalalabad says i, no1 would nag then.

PS:TY for the new map but dont forget the server browser feature plz !
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

Reference URL's
  • Battlefield Play4Free: /forum/index.php
  • :
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/en/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/en/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free requires Windows XP or newer, sorry!
Please upgrade to Internet Explorer 5 or newer.
The 64bit version of Internet Explorer is not currently supported, please use the 32bit version.
Please upgrade to Firefox 1.5 or newer.
Please try Internet Explorer, Firefox or Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free does not currently work with your browser.