Hallo, Gast!

04-01-2012, 08:28 PM | Beitrag #5861
Offline Fowler 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

You stance is wrong, and your community has heard you. You have in fact just shot yourselves in the foot. Goodbye BF purchases, goodbye clan server rentals.
04-01-2012, 08:29 PM | Beitrag #5862
Offline Bond4141 
the first time P4F has had a complete removal for an Over Power instead of a nerf... but lets look at the still standing over powers now, shall we?

-Medics have best gun and can heal selves. (seriously, LMG'S?)
-Alot of talk has been around the Mortar strike being op.
-the Assault has virtually infinite ammo.
-a 50.calaber sniper rifle (these things can go right through engine blocks, rip holes in trees the size of volly balls, if shot right theese can peirce tank armour, but it does a mesaly 68ish damage on a person in this game? before the legacy take out it was 80ish, that would of been acceptable for realism (I thought Battlefield games prided themselves on realism) but i guess not as it takes 2 -body shots to kill a man.
-bullet drop.
-bullet trail
-the graphics (i'm on low, get shot by medics i can't even see.)
-mandatory sway


bought weapons are SUPOSTO BE POWERFULL, when wepon customation came in they became RARE and ENDANGERED! what i'm saying here is that you WANTED us to buy it, then you took it away because it was two powerfull and people complained (they're just sad they didn't bother buying it before)

EA, please make an APPOLOGY thread, at loeast ADMIT you did wrong, you can save yourself SOME respect. mayby refund the battlefunds, i don't care about the real mony (i used SMS any ways) but 3 damage doesn't do much any ways.

[Bild: newsigduckEA.jpg]
04-01-2012, 08:31 PM | Beitrag #5863
Offline [ORION] 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

I would think it difficult to maintain that stance when a majority of your customers are miserable. Damage control should be the number one priority.

Unhappy customers = no $ and bad publicity
04-01-2012, 08:34 PM | Beitrag #5864
Offline Nieknikey 
And still EA did not answer my email. Lets sue them?

[Bild: 85240758.jpg]

Squad manager of the Battlefield Play4Free squad @ Doubledutchclan.nl
04-01-2012, 08:36 PM | Beitrag #5865
Offline Mr.Profesional 
Big peace of Sh*t.

(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 04-01-2012 08:38 PM von Mr.Profesional.)
04-01-2012, 08:41 PM | Beitrag #5866
Offline UselessB 
(04-01-2012 08:29 PM)Bond4141 schrieb:  ....

EA, please make an APPOLOGY thread, at loeast ADMIT you did wrong, you can save yourself SOME respect. mayby refund the battlefunds, i don't care about the real mony (i used SMS any ways) but 3 damage doesn't do much any ways.

Remember EAsy's math skills. +3 is really +2.

<Inappropriate signature removed by HomeSen (read the Forum Rules, again)>

Stating that EA removed content from my account without my permission, after telling me that they wouldn't, is inappropriate.
04-01-2012, 08:44 PM | Beitrag #5867
Offline StarStruck3 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

So...your stance is blatantly endorsing a bait-and-switch tactic?

Ok, you know what? Duck you EA and EAsy. I will NEVER buy another product with your name on it EVER AGAIN. What this is is an outright bait-and-switch. EAsy isn't even bothering to cover it up. They're just blatantly ducking us thinking that we'll keep on taking it. Hopefully they'll get the pants sued off of them for this.

Everyone should look for the P4F reviews and official videos and put negative comments about the game on them...

[Bild: O5fc2.jpg]
The Forsaken Banana
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 04-01-2012 09:17 PM von StarStruck3.)
04-01-2012, 08:50 PM | Beitrag #5868
Offline Henvar 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

and you are?

Simple suggestion for improving teamwork

[Bild: neegamaarlekkerwegdoei.gif]
04-01-2012, 08:50 PM | Beitrag #5869
Offline BlackPercy 
The 20th of December was the death of BFP4F.

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

And this was the official funeral.


Bye.

[Bild: percytest.png]
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 04-01-2012 08:57 PM von BlackPercy.)
04-01-2012, 08:51 PM | Beitrag #5870
Offline Tho-1528 
Fail! You wrote Jan 4 2011, while it has to be 2012!

New sig required...
04-01-2012, 08:54 PM | Beitrag #5871
Offline Septuagint 
(04-01-2012 08:51 PM)Tho-1528 schrieb:  Fail! You wrote Jan 4 2011, while it has to be 2012!


Fixed it EAsily.

[Bild: signature.png]
04-01-2012, 09:01 PM | Beitrag #5872
Offline Motante 
(04-01-2012 08:50 PM)Henvar schrieb:  
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

and you are?
Yes,who are you

[Bild: testef.png]
04-01-2012, 09:07 PM | Beitrag #5873
Offline Parrina 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

Thats exactly what you are doing you stupid wankers!
Listen to your bullsh*t.....i mean really listen to it a few times and tell me wether it makes any sense.You have lied and ripped-off many of us and you cant give a straight answer.
You hide behind your POS agreement.
You should be ashamed to be a part of the human race and go hide in the pond scum with your kind where you belong.
Im freakin really pissed because i hate being ripped-off by idiots!

Ripping you off since Dec.2011.Its the Sleasy way!
04-01-2012, 09:14 PM | Beitrag #5874
Offline ColemanV 
It is fun to know, the blues are back and they still didn't took the effort to at least "we see the comments"!
This is straight-forward jerk behaviour and complete ignorance of paying customers.
They can wave around any papers, about the +3 issue, but there is no excuse for this.

[Bild: EAfailed.png]

follow on twitter EAsyVsMe @ColemanVirgil andFB
04-01-2012, 09:19 PM | Beitrag #5875
Offline Fowler 
An email I just sent to info@easystudios.se:

Good Afternoon,
Since we the Battlefield community are not getting any feedback on the forum, I have decided to reach out via e-mail. As of right now it is 7:45 PM in Sweden as I write this. I probably won't hear anything back until tomorrow morning.
So let's get down to it. This was a post I put in the Battlefield Play 4 Free forum:


"Fowler Wrote: I have sent Silvanoshi a pm and or @OskarBurman on twitter messages. We need to play this right ladies and gents. We also need to stop all this talk of DDos attacks. They need to know the community is not happy with the decision they made on Dec 20, 2011. You can rant and vent about pulling your money out and ceasing the rental of clan servers. Hitting their wallets is one thing, threatening them with assaults and DDos attacks is childish.

To EASY:
Your community is not happy. You have a chance here, a chance to get a good reputation for both EAsy and EA.
Step 1: Admit that the Dec 20th update was a horrible decision. Announce it publicly in the forum and elsewhere on the BP4F site.
Step 2: All those with +3 weapons or equivalent of Veterans Weapons, be given back exactly what they paid for. BP4F is a pay to play game. "Fair and Balanced Play" should mean, those that haven't spent money to be on the same tier as your elite players can fork up the money to be there, if not..oh well.

An example of unfair:
I had purchased the Elite M24 Sniper Rifle. Before Dec 20th it held 9 rounds in the mag. After the update I can only hold 6, unless, I rent an expanded mag for another 3 rounds. So I had 9 rounds, now have 6, but you want me to pay more money for something I already had. Not a good business model.
In this forum there are many diagrams of Elite Weapons next to +3 statistics. You community is not stupid. We know what we paid for and what we now have. If you decide to fix this issue, please let it be known that this community WILL make sure that the weapons we receive are on par with the Elite Weapons we originally purchased.

If this issue is addressed, and you admit your mistake a few things might happen. I am not saying that they 100% will happen but might.
1: Paying players may return.
2: Well known clans might resume server rentals.
3: You could actually save face with your community.
4: New players would feel comfortable paying to be on the same tier as people who pay for Elite Weapons.

You have a chance to save face and make money. Also if I were you, lower your prices. More people would spend money if prices weren't so high. Lower Prices = Higher Volume of purchases. Here in the US we have a huge chain of stores known as Wal-Mart. They have low prices and extremely high sales volume.

Yes guys I pulled the Wal-Mart card..

It's a relatively simple business model and one I think would make people come back and play. Also, and here's a big one, please discuss things with your community before you make a bad decision like this again. Involve the people who make you money, that would be a huge step." <--End of Post



During your normal working hours I sent many messages to different members of you staff and have not heard anything in return. We as the community did however receive this response:

Ainudil Wrote: It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323



That was a gigantic slap in the face to your paying community. I do not see how a company could go so far as to actually hurt the people "pay customers" who make them money. Is this the type of support we as a community can expect? If you ask me this is piss poor service. We as a "PAYING" community do NOT accept this answer. If someone could please respond to this e-mail it would be appreciated. EAsy stands to lose a lot of paying players, due to this update. We had to deal with this fiasco while you were all on holiday break. NOW we would appreciate some answers on some resolution.

I would also appreciate this e-mail be put in the hands of Oscar Burman and Ben Cousin, also a valid response to this e-mail would be appreciated as well.

You all need to stop worrying about the "Camera Shake" issue and get our products back we paid for.

Thanks for your time.
04-01-2012, 09:21 PM | Beitrag #5876
Offline Raijukin 
I very well may be wrong... But isn't this false advertising and fraud on a class action scale?

You advertise a certain products quality.. and then after the purchase you provide a product that does not match what was advertised and/or is of lesser quality? False advertising?

You advertise a certain amount a battlefunds for a certain price but then after purchase you do not provide the battlefunds to the customer and do not give them notice or any update on the situation? isn't that fraud/theft?

If this is the case I think every person affected by this should get the word out and post on every mmo and gaming website there is..

here are a few...

http://www.mmorpg.com/
http://www.onrpg.com/
http://mmohuts.com/
http://www.fpsguru.com/
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 05-01-2012 05:08 AM von Raijukin.)
04-01-2012, 09:25 PM | Beitrag #5877
Offline StarStruck3 
^ let us know if they actually answer back

[Bild: O5fc2.jpg]
The Forsaken Banana
04-01-2012, 09:26 PM | Beitrag #5878
Offline -=OG=-SkinnyG 
(04-01-2012 07:54 PM)CrunchyMuesli schrieb:  Go to Silvanoshi's thread: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

And flag them for illegal activities xD

Just did!

[Bild: jcAwqy0.png]
04-01-2012, 09:27 PM | Beitrag #5879
Offline StarStruck3 
(04-01-2012 09:21 PM)Raijukin schrieb:  I very well may be wrong... But isnt this false advertising and fraud on a class action scale?

You advertise a certain products quality.. and then after the purchase you provide a product that does not match what was advertised and/or is of lesser quality? False advertising?

You advertise a certain amount a battlefunds for a certain price but then after purchase you do not provide the battlefunds to the customer and do not give them notice or any update on the situation? isn't that fraud/theft?

It's not just fraud and false advertisement, it's also bait-and-switch, by taking items that people payed real money for, and replacing them with substandard pieces of junk AFTER you buy them.

[Bild: O5fc2.jpg]
The Forsaken Banana
(Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt bearbeitet: 04-01-2012 09:28 PM von StarStruck3.)
04-01-2012, 09:28 PM | Beitrag #5880
Offline [TA]Stufa 
(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323
Troll, get lost and give a proper answer.



[Bild: va6Fai8.png]



Gehe zu:


WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_ADD_TO_FRIENDS
WEB_PLAYER_PROFILE_REMOVE_FROM_FRIENDS
/de/ajax/checkFriendStatus
/de/ajax/friend
Battlefield Play4Free benötigt mindestens Windows XP.
Bitte aktualisiere auf Internet Explorer 5 oder neuer.
Die 64bit-Version des Internet Explorers wird derzeit nicht unterstützt. Verwende bitte die 32bit-Version.
Bitte aktualisiere auf Firefox 1.5 oder neuer.
Bitte probiere den Internet Explorer, Firefox oder Chrome.
Battlefield Play4Free kann mit deinem Browser derzeit nicht gespielt werden.