[Discuss] The removal of "Legacy" attachments, the introduction of fairer play!

[-=OG=-SkinnyG]

And of course VitalBull$h!t has posted another marketing ploy!

http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...#pid628653

It even states that they are "Original Permanents"

As if anything is "permanent" according to EA$y!!!

DONT BUY DONT BUY DONT BUY, etcetera (for fear of being accused of spamming I'll leave it at that!)

[Shafa_PL]

(04-01-2012 09:26 PM)SkinnyG schrieb:  

(04-01-2012 07:54 PM)CrunchyMuesli schrieb:  Go to Silvanoshi's thread: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

And flag them for illegal activities xD

Just did!

Me too. Bloody thiefs...

[Tuga]

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

It isn't that I don't -believe- you. The simple fact is that you are lowlifes who have lost all credibility. So, you see, it's not like I'm singling you out. Anyone who planned, authorized or worked on this reveals their contempt for the paying players - you know, the ones that actually keep the game afloat and pay for your rent, mortgage, food and toys for your kids. Thieving scumbags is what you are.

That is my stance and now my stance will change repatedly as I teabag you. F U

[Tuga]

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

It isn't that I don't -believe- you. The simple fact is that you are lowlifes who have lost all credibility. So, you see, it's not like I'm singling you out. Anyone who planned, authorized or worked on this reveals their contempt for the paying players - you know, the ones that actually keep the game afloat and pay for your rent, mortgage, food and toys for your kids. Thieving scumbags is what you are.

That is my stance and now my stance will change repatedly as I teabag you. F U

[StarStruck3]

(04-01-2012 09:33 PM)Shafa schrieb:  

(04-01-2012 09:26 PM)SkinnyG schrieb:  

(04-01-2012 07:54 PM)CrunchyMuesli schrieb:  Go to Silvanoshi's thread: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

And flag them for illegal activities xD

Just did!

Me too. Bloody thiefs...

Me three.


Problem, EAsy?

[THEONERUSSIAN]

If I buy items will they be removed at some point?
No, any items you buy after this point you will keep as long as the option you selected. If selected to buy the item forever, that is how long you will keep it and they will not be removed and you characters will not be reset again in the future.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i just got lied to , twice, :(, sniper be mad.....

[soldiersoldier]

sorry EA/EAsy I have lost all my confidence in your products, you lost me as a customer, sorry

[Tuga]

I suggest that you add on to mine and create your own threads warning people:

http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=63951

[road-runn3r]

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

So you must be a new addition to the team and I suppose someone else is fired/resigned amIright?
Ok, first thing you need to do is to actually understand what really happened. (no, having that explained by old devs wont do..)

[Fowler]

Idea Via StarStruck3

[Ghostrider0067]

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

Arrogance and avarice for the people who allow you to remain employed. Interesting... and just like what went down with BFH. I'm surprised you had the nerve to even respond at all, honestly.

[Raijukin]

Again, I may very well be wrong.. But...I don't think it matters what your stance is or what your "terms of service" says... Under federal law, the seller can not violate the Federal Trade Commission laws and regulations governing consumer protection and misleading marketing of products or services.

Your terms of service can only cover you so far... until you start thinking that makes you invincible and start breaking federal law by committing fraud and false advertisement..

[MestreMinete]

(04-01-2012 09:27 AM)Sweaty.Keith schrieb:  How can EAsy talk about removing the legacy items for fairer play, but introduce the Mortar Strike to make the game unfair. Now people are using rockets as guns because the guns are not effective. EAsy you stole my SCAR-L and replaced it with something i didn't purchase.

Well friends this is simple, they removed the legacy items becouse changing the legacy items for other customisation items wouldnt improve the legacy weapons, and like that we wouldt bye the customisation items, and they wouldt be making any money with our weapons, and thats wy they had to downgrade the legacy weapons. But they had a problem, "the 2% forum users are going to be mad at us (EASY)" bah we dont care, we need to make more money, EA will nerf us if we dont ......... good idea lets nerf all the weapons and se what hapens, if we have hier incoming no problem, if we dont will make a cuppon day or something.....what ever......ho cares....hahahah.....


Make my day Easy Give us our weapons back.

[Schlottman]

No more buyin' battlefunds or EA products for me either, that is, unless I am properly compensated, which would be my legacy stuff back, or 3 free permanent attachments.

I know you guys ain't gonna give me back my hard earned cash, so for now on i'll be spending my money on Steam.

[-=OG=-SkinnyG]

(04-01-2012 10:02 PM)Tuga schrieb:  I suggest that you add on to mine and create your own threads warning people:

http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=63951

@Tuga:
Gonna make a new thread?

[Kanzaki]

My Money BACK!!!!!!!!!!! NOW!!!!!!

[Parrina]

It might not be you clowns pulling the strings......there might be a puppetmaster higher up doing that but its still WRONG.
Btw i can totally picture you dumbas*es with someones hand shoved up your backside guiding your every move.

[Vladulain]

I love how my old Elite's MP7 now hits single digits past 25 meters and jumps around like a Jack-hammer.

I love how my old ES-M95 comes with 12 rounds and does a mid-50's damage past 100 meters.

I love how my old VSS Vintorez @ 50 meters doing a 2 round burst, puts one round @ the base of the building and the second in the roof.

I have yet to try the SVU-A, USAS, or Rex that I purchased..nor do I have any desire after this BS.

On the bright side...my Elite's MP443 and Veteran's .45 seem unchanged, you bunch of F-tarded AzZ-Hats missed those....get tah nerfing.

~You just lost an avid spender of BF~

[Wizlawz]

(04-01-2012 05:19 PM)Ainudil schrieb:  It isn't about -ignoring- legacy players. Simple fact is that this is our stance: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

Why was this change made?
The change was made to improve the balance and the overall experience of the game. The "Legacy" attachments were unfortunately too powerful, significantly affecting the game’s balance.


but everyone was crying BOOSTERS OP, NOT Legacy.

and Besides:

(04-01-2012 11:05 PM)Wizlawz schrieb:  the ONLY Reason imho Legacy was "NERFED" Without MANY Complaints on it being OP, as far as i could see anyway.

Was Because Legacy Owners had NO NEED for ATTACHMENTS Really, so the Legacy was OP vs Buying / Renting Attachments.

so had we been using Attachments all would still be good, but hell for Credit price vs Credit Earned per map, it was not fast enough to acquire, so they should have just fixed the Credit Earning BACK to the Way it WAS or something Similar to keep the "RENTING" "Rolling".

Why not increase the stats of the other attachments instead?
Our goal is to create a game that is fun and enjoyable for all our players, from beginners to veterans. If we were to increase the stats of all attachments this would create a much more fast-paced and chaotic experience, that we felt would further imbalance the game and frustrate our community.

Why don’t you listen to the community and what we want?
We absolutely value our community. We constantly monitor our forums for feedback and ideas on how to make Battlefield Play4Free a better game. Your experience is our top priority. We know it hasn’t been fun to feel like you can’t win, and we know it hasn’t been fun to feel like there’s no challenge. This is a situation where we had to make a tough decision, and in the short term, it is not pleasant for everyone, but we believe these changes will lead to a more enjoyable gaming experience for all our players.


BUT According to the replies in this thread: http://battlefield.play4free.com/en/foru...?tid=61323

That ALL Failed.


Stance?.. even in a fist fight a "Stance" is in Constant Change.... if your stance is NOT helping you WIN then it's Time to Find a "Different Stance".

[Gandolf]

I have just reported EA for "scam" on there Facebook page. Maybe others might like to do the same?